Close

Articles Posted in Premises Liability

Updated:

No duty to remove ice and snow from steps during an ongoing storm.

A restaurant did not have a duty to clear ice and snow from its steps while a winter storm was ongoing. In Broyles v. Herrin, No. M2024-00592-COA-R3-CV (Tenn. Ct. App. July 24, 2025), the plaintiff visited defendant restaurant during a winter storm. Snow and ice had been falling for approximately…

Updated:

Golf considered recreational activity under TRUS.

The defendant city was immune from suit under the Tennessee Recreational Use Statute for the plaintiff’s personal injuries incurred while he was playing golf on a city golf course. In Bates v. City of Chattanooga, No. E2024-00857-COA-R3-CV (Tenn. Ct. App. June 4, 2025), the plaintiff fell down steps while playing…

Updated:

Bench with no back not a dangerous condition.

Where a premises liability plaintiff had no proof that a bench outside defendant restaurant was dangerous or defective, summary judgment for the defendant was affirmed. In Ellis v. Snookums Steakhouse, LLC, No. W2024-01165-COA-R3-CV (Tenn. Ct. App. Mar. 11, 2025), the plaintiff ate at defendant restaurant before walking outside. When the…

Updated:

Supreme Court affirms plaintiffs’ premises liability verdict arising from slippery pedestrian bridge.

The Tennessee Supreme Court recently affirmed a premises liability judgment for the plaintiff based on an apartment complex failing to maintain a pedestrian bridge properly. In Trentham v. Mid-America Apartments, LP, No. M2021-01511-SC-R11-CV, — S.W.3d — (Tenn. Jan. 8, 2025), the plaintiff was a tenant in the defendant’s apartment building.…

Updated:

Premises liability summary judgment based on contractor exception overturned.

Where the decedent was an independent contractor who died when a lifting mechanism in the factory failed, there were questions of fact regarding whether the defendant company owed a duty to the decedent, so summary judgment for the defendant company was reversed. In Lowe v. Bridgestone Americas Tire Operations, LLC,…

Updated:

Landlord had duty even when missing hand rail was open and obvious.

Summary judgment for a landlord in a premises liability suit was reversed where the landlord had not installed a stair rail (also known as a handrail) up to code. In Franz v. Funes, No. E2023-01256-COA-R3-CV (Tenn. Ct. App. Sept. 30, 2024), plaintiff leased a residential property from defendant, who owned…

Updated:

Fall Down Case Falls Down

A premises liability plaintiff who had no evidence that defendant construction company controlled the area where she fell did not survive summary judgment. In Brooks v. Whaley Construction, LLC, No. E2023-00711-COA-R3-CV (Tenn. Ct. App. Sept. 23, 2024), plaintiff walked in a grass median after having car trouble. While walking, he…

Updated:

Admissions of plaintiff doom fall-down case.

Where a premises liability plaintiff admitted that she had no evidence regarding how a hole was created, how long it had existed, or that any other person had fallen into it, summary judgment for defendant was affirmed. In Halterman-Scott v. Tennessee Society of Certified Public Accountants, No. M2024-00373-COA-R3-CV (Tenn. Ct.…

Updated:

Interesting Notice Issue in Tennessee Slip and Fall Case In Dollar General Store

After slipping and falling in a retail store, plaintiff had evidence that the store was aware of the spill with enough time to address or warn about it. Summary judgment for the store was therefore reversed. In Alcantar v. Dolgencorp, LLC, No. M2023-01143-COA-R3-CV (Tenn. Ct. App. Sept. 6, 2023), plaintiff…

Contact Us