Understanding Basic Medical Tests

Those of us who are medical malpractice lawyers or personal injury lawyers spend some time every day learning some aspect of medicine.  Like most of you, I am always on the lookout  for good websites that will help me learn some aspect of medicine that will help me help my clients.

Let me a share a good one with you.  The "Stanford 25" is a website that helps medical students understand how to perform 25 common train physicians to glean diagnostic information without technology to augment the information gathered by technology. 

The "Stanford 25" includes information on thyroid examinations, gait abnormalities, pulmonary examinations, and more.   For example, here is the explanation on the fundoscopic exam.

And imagine what your expert can do with it ....

Understanding Brain Injuries - For Lawyers and Juries

Our firm represents people with brain injuries and, depending on the nature of the injury, it can be quite difficult to help a jury understand precisely how these injuries can impact the life of the injured person and his or her entire family.  

This site  offers fundamental principles that one should know about the brain and nervous system, the most complex living structure known in the universe,  are a practical resource about:

  • How your brain works and how it is formed.
  • How it guides you through the changes in life.
  • Why it is important to increase understanding of the brain.

As a Tennessee brain injury attorney, I believe that the concepts presented on this page can be used a part of the jury education process about the brain and brain injuries.

Will We Have Prosthetic Eyes That Can See?

Our firm, the Law Offices of John Day,  has been asked to represent people who have lost their eyesight as a result of medical malpractice or trauma.  Thus, we are very interested in scientific advancements  that can minimize the horrible effects of vision loss.

This reference fin the Fall 2011 Edition of the  Journal of Neuroscience shares some exciting information that provides hope for those who have suffered vision loss:

Sheila Nirenberg of Weill Cornell Medical College presented research on how the eye's own computational "code" can improve retinal prosthetics. Retinal prosthetic devices now exist, but current models require surgery to implant electrodes into the eye and are only capable of restoring crude vision, such as seeing a spot of light or the edge of an object.

Normally, photoreceptors in the retina collect visual information, which is transmitted to retinal ganglion cells and then on to the brain. During retinal-degenerative diseases, photoreceptors and other circuitry dies, but ganglion cells maintain their connections to the brain. Nirenberg's past work has focused on understanding the code of action potentials that neurons in the eye use to transmit visual information. In the current study, she converted images into that neural code and transmitted it to ganglion cells in mice. Encoding the information allowed the ganglion cells to send nearly normal signals to the brain, Nirenberg showed, presumably resulting in more natural vision.

Although traditional retinal prosthetics are electrode-based, Nirenberg's system operates via optogenetics — she uses gene therapy to express channel rhodopsin in mouse ganglion cells, enabling them to respond to light pulses. She foresees the same technology might one day be available to help restore vision in people, using the same gene therapy approach and glasses containing a camera, a signal encoder, and an array of lights.

Together, these studies describe technological advances in the brain-machine interface that in the short term help neuroscientists to investigate how the brain processes information and in the long term may benefit those afflicted by injury or disease. Press conference moderator Nicolelis noted that many of the technologies examined in these studies are becoming more portable, making them more practical for use in a wide range of settings. In addition to addiction, stroke, and retinal degeneration, the speakers noted that brain-machine interface studies may be particularly suited to restoring mobility and communication for people with spinal cord injury, paralysis, and ALS..

These advancements cannot come soon enough.  Good luck, Dr. Nirenberg.

NEJM Editor Asks: Is Academic Medicine for Sale?

Those of us who represent victims of medical negligence and dangerous, defective drugs and medical devices know that a significant percentage of so-called "medical research" is nothing more than fodder prepared to help health care providers and doctors win lawsuits or help manufacturer's reps sell product.  All to often, jurors gobble up the phony information, always assuming that no respectable professional would engage in such conduct and no respectable publication would print it.

It appears that Dr. Marcia Angell, MD., the first woman to serve as Editor of the New England Journal of Medicine. has the same concerns.  In an editorial titled "Is Academic Medicine for Sale?,"  Angell said as follows:

What is wrong with the current situation? Why shouldn't clinical researchers have close ties to industry? One obvious concern is that these ties will bias research, both the kind of work that is done and the way it is reported. Researchers might undertake studies on the basis of whether they can get industry funding, not whether the studies are scientifically important. That would mean more research on drugs and devices and less designed to gain insights into the causes and mechanisms of disease. It would also skew research toward finding trivial differences between drugs, because those differences can be exploited for marketing. Of even greater concern is the possibility that financial ties may influence the outcome of research studies.

You can read the entire editorial here.  Unfortunately, this editorial appeared a decade ago,  and if anything the concerns about the validity of medical research are even greater today.

Thanks to Paul Luvera for reminding me about this article.

Data on Tennessee Hospitals

Bill Leader reminded me the other day that you can access detailed information about Tennessee hospitals from the Tennessee Department of Health Website.   Here is the site.

There is a 40 + page PDF of information on each hospital.  Here is a list of the types of data for each hospital:

Identification

Classification

Accreditations and Approvals

Services

Financial Data

Beds and Bassinets

Utilization

Psychiatric, Chemical Dependency

Emergency Department

Personnel

Medical Staff

Perinatal

Nursing Survey

Health Care Plans

This site will help you gather information to fill in any gaps your expert has on the medical services provided in the community where your medical malpractice defendant practices.

Changes to Tennessee Worker's Compensation Law

This post is part of our continuing effort to advise Tennessee lawyers about substantive law changes resulting from the actions of the General Assembly.

Public Chapter 858 sets forth a procedure for helping injured workers obtain medical benefits they are entitled to receive after a judgment or settlement of a worker's compensation action.  It allows a Department of Labor employee to order an employer to pay for treatment and award attorney's fees and costs incurred by the employee to obtain the benefits.

It became effective on April 30, 2010.

SVMIC Financial Results - 2009

On June 15, 2010 I reported that SVMIC, the bedpan mutual that insures the vast majority of Tennessee doctors,  reduced its rates by 23.1% .  I also reported that  the company declared a $20,000,000 dividend.  The net effect of the dividend means that policyholders with a history of no paid claims will receive another 8% reduction (or so) in rates effective May 15, 2010.

How can SVMIC cut rates so dramatically while paying the highest dividend it has paid in years?   There are two reasons.   First, as a result of the tort reform passed effective October 1, 2008 (revised effective July 1, 2009) claims have decreased substantially.   Fewer claims means reduced claims handling costs, defense fees, court reporter and other litigation fees, and claims payments.  Since the law permits insurers to "write off" reserves as they are established, fewer claims means that reserves are lower than these would have otherwise been had there been more claims.   A decrease in the need to set aside money in reserves for these "absent" claims increases net income.

And how it has increased.   In 2009, SVMIC had a net income (after taxes) of a whopping  $71, 968,000, an increase of over 100% from a year earlier.  

The company had revenues of  $289,482,000 in 2009.  That means its after-tax income was almost 25% of revenue.     For comparison purposes, Walmart's net income was about 6% of its revenue.  Exxon Mobile's was about the same.

Here is a number that is even more shocking.   SVMIC's surplus (think:  net worth)  increased over $100,000,000 in one year, from $251,321,000 to $364,163,000.     Remember, this company has only been in existence about 35 years.

Does this mean that the company will stop its efforts to reduce the right of malpractice victims to have a jury determine the value of their case?  No way.  Here is what the company told its doctor/owners:  "The uncertainty of awards in our civil court system makes the process [of establishing reserves] exceedingly difficult."   Caps on damages will simply that effort, and that is why the company will continue to fight for them, regardless of its profitability.

One last point.  SVMIC is cutting rates not only because of an abundance of wealth but also because of increased competition in the marketplace.   Med mal insurers are in what is known as a "soft market," and thus are scrambling to lower rates to maintain market share.  When rates go up (they always do) medical malpractice victims and juries will be blamed (they always are).

Preventing Pressure Sores

"Pressure Ulcers in the Surgical Patient" is a 38-page study guide prepared for health care providers prepared on behalf of Kimberly-Clark Health Care Education.  Although the article focuses on pressure sores and burns that arise in the care of treatment of surgical patients, the information will be helpful to anyone who is handling a pressure ulcer case.

"A Remedy for Troubled Doctors"

Today's Wall Street Journal has a fascinating article about a California program that helps determine if physicians who have been disciplined can start practicing again.  The goal of PACE (Physician Assessment and Clinical Education Program) is "

to evaluate the competence of troubled doctors whose infractions range from serious medical error and negligence to sloppy record keeping and anger management. Using a mix of computer-based simulations, multiple-choice exams, cognitive-function screenings and hands-on observation, PACE faculty and staff tests doctors' knowledge, skills and judgment, providing remedial courses and a weeklong mini-residency supervised by UCSD medical faculty.

The article also states that

Harvard University patient-safety expert Lucian Leape estimates that as many as 10% of the nation's 750,000 physicians will demonstrate "significant deficiencies in knowledge or skills" at some point in their career. Combine that with other problems, including abusive behavior toward colleagues and patients, drug and alcohol dependency, stress-related mental-health issues and age-related cognitive decline, and at least a third of physicians will have a problem that poses a threat to safe patient care at one time or another, Dr. Leape says.

This sounds like an excellent program - one that is in the best interest of physicians and patients.

 

Hospital Acquired Infections in the News

Two common conditions caused by hospital-acquired infections (HAIs) killed 48,000 people and ramped up health care costs by $8.1 billion in 2006 alone, according to a study released yesterday in the Archives of Internal Medicine.

Here is an excerpt from a summary of the study as reported at www.extendingthecure.com

The researchers looked at infections that developed after hospitalization. They zeroed in on infections that are often preventable, like a serious bloodstream infection that occurs because of a lapse in sterile technique during surgery, and discovered that the cost of such infections can be quite high: For example, people who developed sepsis after surgery stayed in the hospital 11 days longer and the infections cost an extra $33,000 to treat per person.

Even worse, the team found that nearly 20 percent of people who developed sepsis after surgery died as a result of the infection. “That’s the tragedy of such cases,” said Anup Malani, a study co-author, investigator at Extending the Cure, and professor at the University of Chicago. “In some cases, relatively healthy people check into the hospital for routine surgery. They develop sepsis because of a lapse in infection control—and they can die.”

The summary goes on to say as follows:

In 2002, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention estimated that all healthcare-associated infections were associated with 99,000 deaths per year. While the Extending the Cure study looked at only two of the most common and serious conditions caused by these infections, it also calculated deaths actually caused by, rather than just associated with, infections patients get in the hospital.

Based on their research, study authors were able to estimate the annual number of deaths and health care costs due to sepsis and pneumonia that is actually preventable.

“The nation urgently needs a comprehensive approach to reduce the risk posed by these deadly infections," he added. “Improving infection control is a clear way to both improve patient outcomes and lower health care costs.”

You can purchase the Archives of Internal Medicine article here.

Medical Research, Anyone?

Here is a list of medical sites created by  from Exposing Deceptive Defense Doctors by Dorothy Sims as posted here.

 

*www.nlm.nih.gov/

This is the National Library of Medicine/National Institutes of Health, with a great search site.

* www.guidelines.gov/
This is an extremely useful website. It has hundreds of protocols on how to perform procedures, and is very good for use in research if you intend to cross-examine a specialist or get involved in a medical malpractice case.

* www.pubmed.com/
This free website allows you to search extensive medical databases for abstracts of articles by subject or author.

* www.mdconsult.com
This is a pay website, which frequently provides the entire medical journal article (rather than an abstract, as provided by www.pubmed.com).

* www.mdinabox.com/links.php#medical
This is a links page from mdinabox, which gives you good links to medical subspecialties and federal research links, as well.

* www.almexperts.com/ExpertWitness/experts_and_consultants/index.html
This website provides information, including CVs, about experts all over the world. Check out the DME and verify his CV before the deposition.

* www.abms.org/
This site is the American Board of Medical Specialties. Use it to verify the defense witness’s board certification.

Medical Websites by Subspecialty:

American Board of Medical Specialties: www.abms.org

Anesthesiology: www.asahq.org

Cardiology: www.acc.org; www.asecho.org; www.americanheart.org

Chiropractic: www.amerchiro.org; www.accoweb.org; www.nysca.com

Emergency Services: www.aaem.org; www.abem.org; www.acep.org

Endocrinology: www.aace.com; www.diabetes.org; www.endo-society.org

Gastroenterology/Liver: www.acg.gi.org; www.gastro.org; www.asge.org; www.sgna.org; www.liverfoundation.org

General Medicine: www.aafp.com; www.abms.org; www.ama-assn.org; www.aamc.org; www.nysafp.org; www.nycms.org

Hematology: www.hematology.org

Iatrogenic Injuries: www.iatrogenic.org

Immunology: www.ashi-hla.org; www.aaaai.org

Infectious Disease: www.cdc.gov/ncidod/
id_links.htm
; www.amm.co.uk/html/public.htm

Internal Medicine: www.acponline.org; www.abim.org; www.sgim.org

Obstetrics/Gynecology: www.acog.org; www.abog.org; www.accesspub.com/tempobg/soc/socm.htm

Midwifery: www.acnm.org

Neurology: www.stroke.org; www.aan.com; www.neuroguide.com; www.ninds.nih.gov/disorders/stroke/stroke.htm

Oncology: www.asco.org; www.cancernet.nci.nih.gov; www.oncolink.upenn.edu

Opthamology: www.eyenet.org; www.ascrs.org; www.asoprs.org; www.glaucoma-foundation.org

Optometry: www.aaopt.org, www.aoanet.org

Orthopedics: www.aaos.org, www.sportsmed.org

Pediatrics: www.aap.org

Pharmacy: www.aphanet.org

Physical Medicine: www.aapmr.org

Physical Therapy: www.aaptnet.org; www.apta.org; www.nationalrehab.org

Physiology: www.faseb.org

Plastic Surgery: www.plasticsurgery.org

Podiatry: www.apma.org; www.footandankle.com/podmed/

Preventative Medicine: www.acpm.org

Psychiatry: www.abpn.com; www.psych.org

Pulmonology: www.lungusa.org; www.aarc.org; www.chestnet.org; www.thoracic.org

Radiology: www.asrt.org; www.rsna.org; www.acr.org

Rheumatology: www.rheumatology.org; www.arthritis.org

 

Thanks Dorothy.

Breast Cancer Cases

A publication of The Doctors Company ("We were founded by doctors, for doctors.") lists 39 ways  for doctors to get sued for for not diagnosing breast cancer or not properly treating it when it has been diagnosed.    Here it is.

An excerpt:

Ways to Get Sued for Breast Cancer Involving the History and Physical Examination

  • Assume that a mass in a young woman is not cancer.
  • Ignore a breast mass in a pregnant woman.
  • Ignore a breast mass in a lactating woman.
  • Ignore a breast mass in an elderly woman.
  • Allow a negative physical examination to delay biopsy in a patient with a suspicious mammogram.

(There are 14 other items on this list.)

Lawyers can use this list as a way to do an initial screening of breast cancer cases.  I hasten to add, however, that this list (and indeed no list) provides a sufficient basis for filing suit in a breast cancer case.  It is still necessary to consult with at least two experts, one on the standard of care and, usually,  another on causation.  The exception to the need for two experts is in cases involving failure to properly treat diagnosed breast cancer.  In such cases, the standard of care expert (usually an oncologist or surgeon) may well be qualified to give causation testimony.)

Note:  this insurer is to be applauded for using its resources to educate doctors and thereby  reduce the number of injured patients.  This is the way the tort system is supposed to work - personal responsibility imposed on tortfeasors encourages safe practices which reduces future injuries.  True, here it is the insurance company that is facilitating education and change, but who advances the cause of reducing injuries and death is of little meaning or consequence. 

The Alleged IME Exposed

IME.   Independent Medical Exam.  And just how independent is the so-called IME?  The New York Times has looked behind the curtain in New York, and it doesn't like what it saw.

Here is an excerpt:  "'If you did a truly pure report,” [the IME doctor] said later in an interview, “you’d be out on your ears and the insurers wouldn’t pay for it. You have to give them what they want, or you’re in Florida. That’s the game, baby.'”

Here is the article.

Mild Traumatic Brain Injury in the ER

The American College of Emergency Physicians has released a new clinical policy called  "Clinical Policy: Neuroimaging and Decisionmaking in Adult Mild Traumatic Brain Injury in the Acute Setting." 

The Merck Manual

It doesn't necessarily represent the standard of care.  It is the place to begin, not end, your medical research.  But it is a great place to start.   Merck Manual

Saying It Don't Make It So

Many Americans are frustrated by the our health care system but quickly declare it to be the best in the world. 

A new study challenges that belief, pointing out that "the U.S. spends twice per capita what other major industrialized countries spend on health care, and costs continue to rise faster than income" and yet "the U.S. achieves an overall score of 65 out of a possible 100 when comparing national averages with U.S. and international performance benchmarks."

This is  an excerpt from the executive summary of the report in the issue of quality:

 Effective care: Control of diabetes and high blood pressure improved markedly from 1999–2000 to 2003–2004 for adults, according to physical exams conducted on a nationally representative sample. Among adults with diabetes, rates of at least fair control of blood sugar increased from 79 percent to 88 percent from 1999–2000 to 2003–2004. Among adults with hypertension, rates of control of high blood pressure increased from 31 percent to 41 percent over the same time period. Yet, a 30 to 60 percentage point difference remains between top- and bottom performing health plans. Hospitals' adherence to treatment standards for heart attack, heart failure, and pneumonia also improved from 2004 to 2006, but with a persistent gap between leading and lagging hospital groups. Delivery rates for basic preventive care failed to improve: as of 2005, only half of adults received all recommended preventive care.
Coordinated care: Heart failure patients were more likely to receive hospital discharge instructions in 2006 (68%) than in 2004 (50%), but rates varied widely between top and bottom hospital groups (from 94% to 36%). Hospitalizations increased among nursing home residents from 2000 to 2004, as did rehospitalizations for patients discharged to skilled nursing facilities—signaling a need to improve long-term care and transitions between health care providers.


Safe care: One key indicator of patient safety—hospital standardized mortality ratios—improved significantly since the first Scorecard, with a 19 percent decline. Safety risks, however, remain high as one-third of adults with health problems reported mistakes in their care in 2007. Drug safety is of particular concern. Rates of visits to physicians or emergency departments for adverse drug effects increased by one-third between 2001 and 2004.


Patient-centered, timely care: In 2007, as in 2005, less than half of U.S. adults with health problems were able to get a rapid appointment with a physician when they were sick. They also were the most likely among adults in seven countries surveyed to report difficulty obtaining health care after hours without going to the emergency department, and this rate increased from 61 percent to 73 percent since 2005. Within the U.S., there is wide variation among hospitals in terms of patient reports of how well staff responded to their needs.

Read more here.

Surgical Errors

The November 2007 Annals of Surgery  has an interesting article on surgical errors.  The abstract of the article says that  the authors "analyzed 444 randomly sampled surgical malpractice claims from four liability insurers. Among 258 claims in which injuries due to error were detected, 52% (n = 133) involved technical errors."

They found that "[f]orty-nine percent of the technical errors caused permanent disability; an additional 16% resulted in death. Two-thirds (65%) of the technical errors were linked to manual error, 9% to errors in judgment, and 26% to both manual and judgment error. A minority of technical errors involved advanced procedures requiring special training ("index operations"; 16%), surgeons inexperienced with the task (14%), or poorly supervised residents (9%). The majority involved experienced surgeons (73%), and occurred in routine, rather than index, operations (84%). Patient-related complexities-including emergencies, difficult or unexpected anatomy, and previous surgery-contributed to 61% of technical errors, and technology or systems failures contributed to 21%."

So, what do they conclude?  "Most technical errors occur in routine operations with experienced surgeons, under conditions of increased patient complexity or systems failure. Commonly recommended interventions, including restricting high-complexity operations to experienced surgeons, additional training for inexperienced surgeons, and stricter supervision of trainees, are likely to address only a minority of technical errors. Surgical safety research should instead focus on improving decision-making and performance in routine operations for complex patients and circumstances."

I thought the "error in judgment" number was the fascinating.  After 26 years of work in this area of the law, I have heard everything blamed on error in judgment.

Find the article here.  Thanks to the DC Med Mal Blog for informing me about the article.

Tort Cases By The Numbers - Part 2

Yesterday I wrote about tort statistics revealed by the 2006-07 "Annual Report of the Tennessee Judiciary."  Among the statistics I cited was that there were 584 medical malpractices cases filed in the state of Tennessee and a total of 15 medical malpractice trials.

To put that in perspective, remember that according to the National Institute of Health 98,000 people a year die in the United States from malpractice in hospitals alone.  Assuming that Tennessee is neither worse nor better than average, that means that 1986 Tennesseans die each year as a result of malpractice in a hospital setting (because we have about 2% of the nation's population).

And yet only 584 malpractice cases were filed in the entire state for the fiscal year ending June 30, 2007.  Those cases presumably involved not only deaths in hospitals but also injuries in hospitals and deaths and injuries in outpatient settings, nursing homes and surgery centers.  They also include cases against pharmacies and home health agencies and outpatient physical therapy centers.

Look at Davidson County.  It had 166 medical malpractice cases filed.  Using statistics complied the Tennessee Advisory Commission on Intergovernmental Relations, one can determine that Davidson County has about 3200 doctors, 3600 hospital beds and 3000 nursing home beds.  Assuming the hospitals run an 60% census (and that is just a guess) Davidson County has just over 788,000 total hospital bed days per year.   Assuming a 90% census (another guess) for nursing homes,  there are  just under 1,000,000 nursing home bed days in Davidson County per year. 

That's about 1,800,000 patient days where patients receiving care and are exposed to the risk of a medical error.

If the average physician performs services for 60 patients per week 48 weeks per year that is another 9,200,000 patient contacts.

Now, we all know that there were more than 166 injuries and deaths caused by medical negligence in Davidson County in the year covered by the Report.  Indeed, the NIH statistics tell us that there were about 190 deaths.

So what's going on?  There are lots of explanations.  First, lawyers who do medical malpractices cases do not take "small" cases because the costs of prosecuting the cases is significant and the time that must be invested makes pursuit of the cases uneconomical.  Most medical errors cause relatively minor injuries.  Second, a significant number of patients don't want to be involved in litigation, which is certainly understandable.  Third, a good number of patients (or their survivors) don't know what happened to give rise to an injury or death and lack the will, sophistication, or energy to investigate it.  Fourth, some patients who make inquiry are not told the truth.  And undoubtedly there are other reasons as well.

But I think these numbers tell us that (a) there is not an explosion in claims against health care providers and (b) if anything, the legal system has done a poor job providing access to justice for people with "small" cases.  The ultimate cost of malpractice in all those cases is borne by the patients and their health insurers (public or private).

The statistics cited above need to be refined slightly.  I don't have the precise number of doctors in the state or in any county, the average census of hospitals or nursing homes, etc.  But I think at the end of the day the statistics determined with more reliable figures would demonstrate that the so-called medical malpractice crisis is manufactured.

By the way, here is a link to the Department of Commerce and Insurance Report on Medical Malpractice cases.  Please note that it uses calendar years for reporting.

Medical Diagnosis/Code - Acronym Look Up

This post is taken from an email sent out by Janabeth Fleming Taylor at Attorney Medical Services:


ICD-9 codes (Think of it as "Diagnosis" Code)

http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/icd9.htm

The International Classification of Diseases (ICD) is the classification used to code and classify mortality data from death certificates.

The International Classification of Diseases, Clinical Modification (ICD-9-CM) is used to code and classify morbidity data from the inpatient and outpatient records, physician offices, and most National Center for Health Statistics (NCHS) surveys.

CPT Codes -Current Procedural Terminology (Think of it as "Procedure Code" upon which reimbursement is determined)

https://catalog.ama-assn.org/Catalog/cpt/cpt_search.jsp?checkXwho=done

CPT Codes describe medical or psychiatric procedures performed by physicians and other health providers. The codes were developed by the Health Care Financing Administration (HCFA) to assist in the assignment of reimbursement amounts to providers by Medicare carriers. A growing number of managed care and other insurance companies, however, base their reimbursements on the values established by HCFA.

Since the early 1970s, HCFA has asked the American Medical Association (AMA) to work with physicians of every specialty to determine appropriate definitions for the codes and to try to determine accurate reimbursement amounts for each code. Two committees within AMA work on these issues: the CPT Committee, which updates the definitions of the codes, and the RUC (Relative Value Update Committee), which recommends reimbursement values to HCFA based on data collected by medical societies on the going rate of services described in the codes.

Medicare Unique Physician Identification Numbers (UPIN) - UPIN is a six-position alphanumeric identifier that is assigned to all Medicare physicians, medical groups and non-physician practitioners.

UPIN are assigned as follows:

Physicians (Medical Doctors) begin with A - M
Limited License Practitioners, e.g., Chiropractors, Dentist, etc, begin with T - V
Non-Physician Practitioners, e.g., Anesthesia Assistants, Physician Assistants, Clinical Nurse Practitioners, etc, are assigned P -S
Group Entities, e.g., Ambulance, Independent Physiological Lab, etc, are assigned W - Y
See below for the applicable Credential Codes:

AA : Anesthesia Assistant
AMB : Ambulance Service Supplier
ASC : Ambulatory Surgical Center
AU : Audiologist
CH : Chiropractor
CNA : Certified Nurse Anesthetist
CNM : Certified Nurse Midwife
CNS : Certified Clinical Nurse Specialist
CP : Clinical Psychologist
CSW : Clinical Social Worker
DDM : Doctor of Dental Medicine
DDS : Doctor of Dental Surgery
DO : Doctor of Osteopathy
DPM : Podiatrist
FNP : Family Nurse Practitioner
GRP : Group
IDF : Independent Diagnostic Facility
IPL : Independent Physiological Lab
LAB : Laboratory
MD : Medical Doctor
MSC : Mammography Screening Center
NP : Nurse Practitioner
OD : Doctor of Optometry
OT : Occupational Therapist
PA : Physician Assistant
PHS : Public Health Service
PSY : Psychologist
PT : Physical Therapist
PXS : Portable XRay Supplier
RNA : Certified Registered Nurse

Code Modifiers for Alternative Medicine - ABC codes and terminology are maintained and developed annually as consumers, individual practitioners, practitioner associations and other health industry organizations submit code requests that reflect current practices in alternative medicine, nursing and integrative healthcare. This is an attempt to fill in the "gaps" left from other coding, and is done to support research and compile data by practioner type. These include treatment by massage therapists, acupuncturists, etc. These may not be seen in traditional billing records, but may be referenced in charting or other records obtained from non-traditional medical sources: http://www.alternativelink.com/ali/abc_codes/code_mode.asp

Spine School

Need to go to back to school on the neck and back?  Check out Spine University.

Click on the Spine Wizard, select the area of the spine that you are interested in, and read a detailed description of the various procedures that can be used to treat pain in that area.

There are also printable booklets on these subjects:

Spine University Topics (Spine - General)

Spondyloarthropathies

Spine University Topics (Spine - Cervical)

Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion

Cervical Artificial Disc Replacement

Cervical Corpectomy and Strut Graft

Cervical Discectomy

Cervical Foraminotomy

Spine University Topics (Spine - Lumbar)

Anterior Lumbar Fusion with Cages

Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion

Back Care Boot Camp

Low Back Pain

Lumbar Artificial Disc Replacement

Spine University Topics (Spine - Thoracic)

Kyphoplasty

Scheuermann's Disease

Spinal Compression Fractures

Thoracic Disc Herniation

Thoracic Spine Anatomy


Chronic Pain Management

Epidural Steroid Injections

Facet Joint Injections

Injections for Pain Prin

Pain Pumps

Fetal Monitoring

A professional liability insurer has posted this information on fetal monitoring for doctors.

The opening paragraph:  "Initially, the fetal monitor was developed for the intrapartum period to better evaluate the status of the fetus during labor. Earlier identification of pending acidosis and hypoxia would alert the obstetric team, leading to more timely intervention and thus a significant reduction in the incidence of neonatal morbidity and mortality. Though clinical trials have failed to demonstrate a significant impact on morbidity and mortality, fetal monitoring is now essentially universal."

This is interesting:

"While monitoring can be ambiguous, certain persistent patterns on a tracing require a response on the part of the practitioner. These include but are not limited to:

                    Severe variable decelerations
                    Persistent late decelerations with a nonreactive tracing
                    Persistent fetal tachycardia with a nonreactive tracing
                    Prolonged bradycardia

Failure to execute an intervention or form a plan in these situations may make it difficult to defend against a malpractice allegation. "

Patient Safety Website

The Joint Commission on International Patient Safety has a website that it calls "Patient Safety Practices."

Here is the introduction to the site:  "Welcome to Patient Safety Practices, a new online resource for health care professionals and the public. Over 900 links to trusted patient safety websites are provided, with tips, tools and resources for addressing patient safety problems. The problem categories and topics have been culled from the Joint Commission's Sentinel Event Database."

If you are looking for information on wrong site surgery, you will find links to a large number of sites, including this one from the American College of Surgeons.

Enjoy.

Guidelines and Levels of Care for Pediatric Intensive Care Units

The American Association of Pediatricians  has issued  "Guidelines and Levels of Care for Pediatric Intensive Care Units." 

The abstract: "The practice of pediatric critical care medicine has matured dramatically during the past decade. These guidelines are presented to update the existing guidelines published in 1993. Pediatric critical care services are provided in level I and level II units. Within these guidelines, the scope of pediatric critical care services is discussed, including organizational and administrative structure, hospital facilities and services, personnel, drugs and equipment, quality monitoring, and training and continuing education. "

The citation:  PEDIATRICS Vol. 114 No. 4 October 2004, pp. 1114-1125.

Here is the PDF version of the article.

Playing the Game with Statistics - and Playing it Wrong

Author of a recent article published  in Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy have taken a hard look at the 1986 article in the New England Journal of Medicine by Karin Nelson and Jonas Ellenberg that led the medical community to sing in chorus that lack of oxygen was rarely a cause of cerebral palsey.

The new article finds that the central argument of the 1986 article relies on "straightforwardly fallacious statistical reasoning."  The author's concern is that the 1986 article  improperly influences "how carefully fetuses are monitored during labor and delivery, expert testimony in malpractice cases, and public policy decisions."

(Remember my recent post on the birth-related injuries prevented by Seaton hospitals after they instituted various measures to provide more uniform care to expectant mothers?  If lack of oxygen is rarely a cause of cerebral palsey why did those (and other) injuries decrease by almost 90% when new procedures were adopted?)

You can purchase the article here, although I must tell you that if you lack a solid background in statistics it is a challenge to read and comprehend.  I would post the article for you but I am not sure I have the right to do that since you have to pay ($30) to purchase it.

What I find interesting about the article is that it provides more evidence that we must never accept as true what we read in medical literature.  As recent experience as shown regarding the risks associated with consumption of Vioxx, information contained in medical journals is not necessarily true or complete.  The authors of some of the articles  have an agenda other than helping other doctors treat patients, or they may be receiving compensation from, say, a drug or device manufacturer that may cause reasonable people to give different weight  to the findings and conclusions expressed.

Over time, things tend to work out.  By that I mean that erroneous positions in medical articles will be exposed over time.  One problem is that in the meantime tremendous harm can be done to patients and litigants when "experts" rely on medical or scientific literature that lacks a solid basis.

The other problem is the resources to attack "bad" literature.  It costs alot of money to conduct solid scientific research?  Who pays for the effort?  A competing drug company or manufacturer?  The government?  Plaintiff's lawyers?

Three things must be done at a minimum.  First, the editors of the publications must conduct true peer review of the research, insisting that the researchers disclose all underlying data, assumptions, etc.  Second, the editors must insist upon complete disclosure of all economic and other ties between the authors, their institutions and families with any entity that could economically benefit from the publication of the research.  The disclosure should be a "black box" disclosure, such as you find in the PDR about very significant adverse risks attendant to the use of certain medications.

Finally, judges must be educated that the mere fact that something is published in medical or scientific literature doesn't make it Gospel.  There is a tendency for all of us to assume that if something finds its way to a publication it must be accurate, particularly if the publication is well-known.  But, as the recent experiences with Vioxx tell us, even the folks at the NEJM can be lead astray.

 

 

Medical Images

A picture is worth a thousand words - or maybe more.

Click here to get access to a great list of websites that have videos and stills on a host of medical issues. Some of the sites are copyrighted, but at least you can look at the sites to educate yourself and, if you need to use the images for deposition, mediation or trial, know where you can purchase the images you need.

Thanks again to Robert for telling me about this site.

New CPR and ECC Guidelines

Read more about the American Heart Association's new CPR and ECC guidelines at this post our medical malpractice blog.

Anesthesia Standards

Here is the website of the American Society of Anesthesiologists that lists their "Standards, Guidelines and Statements."

There is a gold mine of information here for use in medical negligence cases.

List of Sources of Medical Information

This is a link to doctor's website that collects a large number of sources of medical information. It is the best collection of medical links I have seen to date.