Close

Day on Torts

Updated:

Lawyer Medical Malpractice Reports Due March 2

The Tennessee Medical Malpractice Reporting Act found at Tenn. Code Ann. §§ 56-54-101, et seq. went into effect on January 1, 2009 and replaced statutes regarding similar previous reporting requirements.   Bold the old and new statute require that lawyers report all medical malpractice settlements and judgments obtained in calender year 2008. The…

Updated:

Insurance Policies Limits Are Not Discoverable UPDATED

The Tennessee Supreme Court has just ruled that liability insurance policy limits are not discoverable in typical personal injury and wrongful death cases in Tennessee.  Unlike the vast majority of states, our TRCP 26 does not mandate disclosure of limits.  The Court ruled that insurance policy information  " is not subject to…

Updated:

February 2009 Tennessee Trial Law Report

The February 2009 edition of the Tennessee Trial Law Report is at the printer  and will be mailed to subscribers in the next day or two. This edition includes a summary of 24 different cases addressing various aspects of the law of torts, civil procedure, evidence and trial as decided by Tennessee appellate…

Updated:

When Winning A Case Costs Your Client Money

The goal of lawyers who represent plaintiffs in personal injury and wrongful death lawsuits is to help the client.  But sometimes the receipt of proceeds from a lawsuit can actually cost your client money.  How can that be?  If your client is receiving Supplemental Security Income (SSI) and the settlement…

Updated:

Yet Another Opinion on the Law of Expert Testimony

The Tennessee Supreme Court has issued another opinion about expert testimony, this one concerning the ability of a family practice doctor to testify about a criminal defendant’s ability to form the required mental state to commit a crime.  The Court ruled that the expert was qualified to give such an…

Updated:

New Tennessee Supreme Court Opinion on Admissibility of Expert Testimony

The Tennessee Supreme Court has just released an opinion reversing the ruling of a trial judge who excluded the testimony of a sleep expert in a criminal case.  The defendant alleged that he did not have the criminal intent to commit sexual acts with his stepdaughter because he was asleep…

Contact Us