Anna Ayala, the woman who claimed that she found a finger in a bowl of Wendy’s Chili, has plead guilty to filing a false claim and attempted grand theft. Her husband has also plead guilty for his part in the scheme.
The finger turned out to be that of a co-worker of her husband; it was lost in an industrial accident.
She is facing 10 years in the slammer. He is facing 13 years.
As reported here early earlier, Guidant has a problem with some of its defibrillators and has know about it for over three years. Now, it appears that it disclosed at least a part of what it knew to the FDA in February but the FDA did not act until June.
The New York Times just got the report under a FOIA request – a request orginally rejected by the FDA.
Read more here. For my other posts on this subject click here and here.
The Supreme Court of South Dakota has ruled that in a civil action arising out of the decedent’s death by suicide the jury should have been instructed to “evaluate the effect of [the decedent’s] mental incapacity in judging [the decedent’s] contributory negligence.” Because the jury was instructed to use the typical “reasonable person standard” a verdict for the defendant was reversed.
The Court cited with approval the following language from the North Dakota instructions: “If the patient’s capacity for self care is so diminished by mental illness that it is lacking, we agree that an allocation of fault is not appropriate. . . In making the fault comparison, the factfinder should always take into account the extent of the patient’s diminished mental capacity to care for his own safety.”
Those of you who read the Tennessee Tort Law Letter know that I depise Tennessee’s limitations on the liability of governmental entities. I think a limb or life of a person should be worth the same regardless of whether the tortfeasor is a person, an entity, or a governmental entity.
Over the years I have been particularly frustrated with how governmental entities, protected by a damage cap, negotiate settlements. This will be no new news to those of you who represent plaintiffs, but it seems that these entities always want “to save a little.” It drives me crazy that a case worth X but subject to a cap of 1/2 X is difficult to settle at 1/2 X. My frustration with this mindset has often caused me to lash out out governmental entities and their lawyers.
Well, we have recently been involved in two cases where the response of the governmental entities and their lawyers was very different. In one, the entity offered the cap before suit was filed. To be sure, the case was worth 10 times the cap, but City stepped up to the plate, did the right thing, and resolved the case.
I know some of you may be sick of reading about the Texas Vioxx trial, but this piece – a Q & A with Mark Lanier with questions posted by readers – is different and very interesting. Note the resources Lanier poured into this trial.
The NYT has reported that Ford has recalled almost 4,000,000 trucks and SUVs, saying that a problem with the cruise control could cause the vehicle to catch fire. There have been almost 1200 reports of fire to date. Ford had earlier recalled almost 800,000 for a simliar concern.
The model years at issue are 1994 – 2002.
According to the Times, “Ford said it believed that brake fluid may leak from the switch that deactivates the cruise control once the driver steps on the brake pedal. That fluid can drip down to the cruise control’s electrical component, cause corrosion and ignite a fire, the company said.”
A new study reports that doctors should not give clot-busting drugs to patients who are going to receive angioplasty. Doing so increased the death rate by 40%. The results were so surprising that the study was stopped before it was complete.
Well, round two starts on Monday in New Jersey. This case appears stronger on causation that the Texas case, but now Merck has a good idea about what will be coming. Then again, so do the plaintiff’s lawyers.
Here is a nice summary of the case.
What does the industry say about how a product should be manufactured? Look to this site as a resource for product safety research.
The site also has links to information about problems with medical devices, product recalls, and patent data.
Thanks to Bob Kraft for bringing this site to my attention.
Ms Matney, a MS patient residing in a nursing home, died from over exposure to the sun. Her daughter has filed suit against the nursing home.
The Toledo Blade reports that Ms Matney was permitted to sunbathe on a day where the temperatures exceeded 93 degrees. Her body temperature rose to 109 degrees. The county coroner has ruled the death accidental due to negligence; the cause of death was hyperthermia and heat stroke.
