When a woman had left work early and was on a completely personal errand at the time she caused an automobile accident, her employer could not be held liable for her actions. In Gunter v. Estate of Armstrong, No. E2018-01473-COA-R3-CV (Tenn. Ct. App. Aug. 12, 2019), plaintiff sued the employer…
Day on Torts
Payments to Professionals Who Were Fact Witnesses For Case and Discovery Preparation
The Florida Supreme Court ruled that it is appropriate for a lawyer to pay professionals who were fact witnesses in a commercial litigation controversy for their assistance directly related to case and discovery preparation. In Trial Practices, Inc. v. Hahn, Loeser & Parks, LLC, the court addressed the issue of whether the…
No Motion for New Trial? Issues Waived.
Where plaintiffs failed to file any post-trial motions, most of the issues they tried to raise on appeal were waived. In Smith v. Benihana National Corp., No. W2018-00992-COA-R3-CV (Tenn. Ct. App. Aug. 9, 2019), plaintiffs filed suit on behalf of decedent’s family members after decedent died while dining at a…
Claims Commissioner’s Ruling Affirmed in Battle of the Experts Wrongful Death Case
Where a Claims Commissioner credited the testimony of defendant’s expert over plaintiffs’ expert in a wrongful death case, the Court of Appeals affirmed the ruling. In Jones v. State of Tennessee, No. M2017-02198-COA-R3-CV (Tenn. Ct. App. July 24, 2019), plaintiffs’ son was a football player at Tennessee State University (TSU).…
Product Liability and the Duty to Warn (And More)
In an asbestos case, a balancing test should have been used to determine whether manufacturers “had a duty to warn about the post-sale integration of asbestos-containing products manufactured and sold by others.” Further, expert testimony regarding the effects of asbestos exposure on a plaintiff did not have to be based…
Nuisance Can Occur on Property Owned by Neither Plaintiff Nor Defendant
A defendant can be liable for nuisance damages even when the nuisance occurred on property that neither plaintiff nor defendant owned. In Ryan v. Soucie, No. E2018-01121-COA-R3-CV (Tenn. Ct. App. July 18, 2019), plaintiff filed a claim for nuisance and intentional interference with business relationships after defendant blocked a…
Defective Pre-Suit Notice In Case 1 Bars Use of Savings Statute in Case 2
In order to take advantage of the 120-day extension of the Tennessee HCLA provided by giving pre-suit notice, a plaintiff must have provided a HIPAA-compliant medical authorization with the notice. The case of Webb v. AMISUB (SFH) Inc., No. W2017-02539-COA-R3-CV (Tenn. Ct. App. Mar. 29, 2019), concerned whether a…
Neurosurgery Consultant Not Qualified As Expert Against Urgent Care Center Nurses or Physician
Where plaintiff could only show that his expert in an HCLA case was a neurosurgeon consultant during the year prior to the incident, yet the alleged negligence was committed by a medical assistant and licensed practical nurse (LPN) in an urgent care clinic, plaintiff’s expert was not qualified to testify…
Suicide and Foreseeability
Where a defendant (who happened to by a psychiatrist) knew of decedent’s past suicide attempt, knew he had just ended his relationship with her, and let the decedent stay in his home alone with an unsecured gun, the Tennessee Supreme Court reinstated the trial court’s grant of summary judgment on…
Legal Malpractice Case Dismissed – No Causation As A Matter of Law
Where a legal malpractice plaintiff could not “prove that he would have obtained relief in the underlying lawsuit but for the attorney’s malpractice,” summary judgment was affirmed. In Marble v. Underwood, No. M2017-02040-COA-R3-CV (Tenn. Ct. App. June 24, 2019), plaintiff filed a legal malpractice action against the attorney who had…