FDCC Quarterly, a publication of the Federation of Defense and Corporate Counsel, has published an article on the impact of the relatively recent decisions of United States Supreme Court in Iqual and Twombly.
This is how the authors summarize the holdings of the two decisions:
Together, Iqbal and Twombly held that, to comply with the pleading requirements of Rule 8(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, a complaint must allege well-pleaded factual allegations (and not legal conclusions or bare recitations of the elements of a cause of action) that if presumed true ‘plausibly give rise to an entitlement to relief.’ Iqbal made clear this test should apply to all civil complaints. [Footnotes omitted.]