Day on Torts

January 18, 2011

Statistics on Tort Cases From the 2009-10 AOC Annual Report on the Judiciary – Part 3

As mentioned in the last two posts (here and here), the Tennessee Administrative Office of the Courts has released the 2009-2010 Annual Report of the Judiciary. The Report Contains statistical data about our court system.

Today we look at additional information about tort cases that were filed or tried in state court in Tennessee. "Tort cases" includes medical malpractice cases.

Of the 229 cases that were tried that resulted in damage awards for the plaintiff, the total damages awarded were $91,682,216. This is an increase of a little over $8,000,000 from a year earlier. The average award, then, was $400,359.

January 17, 2011

More Statistics on Tort Cases From the 2009-2010 AOC Annual Report on the Judiciary

by The Law Offices of John Day, P.C.

As mentioned yesterday, the Tennessee Administrative Office of the Courts has released the 2009-2010 Annual Report of the Judiciary. The Report Contains statistical data about our court system.

Today we look at information about tort cases that were filed or tried in state court in Tennessee. "Tort cases" includes medical malpractice cases.

There were 10,469 tort cases filed in Tennessee in the year ending June 30, 2010. This is down about 6% from two years earlier – in the year ended June 30, 2008, there were 11,171 filings.

January 16, 2011

State of Tennessee Litigation Statistics From the AOC Annual Report

by The Law Offices of John Day, P.C.

The Tennessee Administrative Office of the Courts has released the 2009-2010 Annual Report of the Tennessee Judiciary. Over the next few days I will share some data from the Report.

We begin with medical malpractice cases. In the fiscal year ending June 30, 2010, 429 medical malpractice cases were resolved by judgment, settlement or dismissal. Only 324 new cases were filed.

There were only 30 medical malpractice cases actually tried in state court in Tennessee during the fiscal year. The total awards for the patient in those cases were $7,128,800. Unfortunately, the Report does not indicate the number of cases won by the patient or by the health care provider. Historically, that number is about 20% of all trials.

January 14, 2011

First Defamation Case Arising From A Tweet Goes to Trial

by The Law Offices of John Day, P.C.

That tweet might just get you sued. Courtney Love allegedly fired off a negative tweet about a fashion designer, and now the defamation case against Love is going to trial.

Read more about it at this post from the Connecticut Business Litigation Blog.

January 7, 2011

From Max Kennerly: Philosophy Explains How Legal Ethics Turn Lawyers Into Liars

by The Law Offices of John Day, P.C.

This is one of the best articles I have read in a long time, coming from a man who I have cited often but never met: Max Kennerly.

A short sample:

At these pre-trial events [hearings, pretrial conferences, etc.], the only thing stopping a lawyer from looking the judge in the eye and telling him or her an outright lie is that oath the lawyer made to the government years ago.

January 6, 2011

Important Decision on Removal of Tort Cases to Federal Court

by The Law Offices of John Day, P.C.

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit has ruled that the 30-day period for removing a case to federal court does not begin to run until "the plaintiff serves the defendant with a paper that explicitly identified the amount of damages sought."

Moltner sued Starbucks in state court in New York but did not state the amount of damages he sought. Moltner’s lawyer later sent a three million dollar demand letter to Starbucks. Starbucks filed a petition to remove the case to federal court more than 30 days after it received the complaint but less than 30 days after receiving the $3 million demand. The Second Circuit permitted the removal, rejecting the argument that Starbucks should have deduced from reading the complaint that the case sought damages in excess of the jurisdictional amount of the federal courts.

Here is the opinion in Moltner v. Starbucks Coffee Company, No. 09-4943 (2nd Cir. Nov. 2, 2010).

January 5, 2011

Seat Belt Preemption Case Before SCOTUS

by The Law Offices of John Day, P.C.

Oral arguments were heard two months ago in Williamson v. Mazda Motors of America, and when the United States Supreme Court decides the case we will have a better understanding of the law of preemption.

At issue is whether a National Highway Traffic Safety Administration rule permitting the use of Type1 seat belts (lap belt only) in the middle seat of passenger vehicles preempts a claim by an injured passenger that the manufacturer should have installed a Type 2 belt (includes a shoulder harness) in the vehicle.

The California Court of Appeals held that the claim was preempted. The California Supreme Court refused to hear the case. The US Supreme Court heard oral arguments on the case on November 3.

January 4, 2011

Lawyer Pay

by The Law Offices of John Day, P.C.

Payscale.com has posted data on the pay for lawyers. On average, associates with at least three years of experience earn $75,400 per year. Lawyers with 10-15 years of experience earn an average of $123,000 per year.

Thanks to Lawyers USA for sharing this data.

January 3, 2011

Jury Selection Software for iPad

by The Law Offices of John Day, P.C.

Are you an iPad user? Here is a new app that facilitates jury selection. Here is a video on how to use the app.

Turn to Tablet Legal for more information about how to use the iPad in your practice.

December 29, 2010

Uninsured Motorist Article Published in the TBA Journal

by The Law Offices of John Day, P.C.

The Tennessee Bar Association has graciously permitted me to write a column on tort law for many years. I must admit that I enjoy writing these articles, although I must also admit that each time the calendar reminder pops-up on my computer reminding me of yet another deadline for yet another article a small groan slips out from my aging body.

The January 2011edition of the Journal is now available. My newest article is titled "Presents From ‘Round Back of the Tree." The article alerts readers to two recent Court of Criminal Appeals cases that may be of assistance to tort lawyers as they attempt to prove John Doe UM claims.

Confused? Here are the first three paragraphs (footnotes omitted). Read them and see if you can figure out where the article is headed.