Author of a recent article published in Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy have taken a hard look at the 1986 article in the New England Journal of Medicine by Karin Nelson and Jonas Ellenberg that led the medical community to sing in chorus that lack of oxygen was rarely a cause of cerebral palsey.
The new article finds that the central argument of the 1986 article relies on "straightforwardly fallacious statistical reasoning." The author’s concern is that the 1986 article improperly influences "how carefully fetuses are monitored during labor and delivery, expert testimony in malpractice cases, and public policy decisions."
(Remember my recent post on the birth-related injuries prevented by Seaton hospitals after they instituted various measures to provide more uniform care to expectant mothers? If lack of oxygen is rarely a cause of cerebral palsey why did those (and other) injuries decrease by almost 90% when new procedures were adopted?)