The Tennessee Supreme Court has issued an opinion interpreting Rule 35 of the Tennessee Rules of Civil Procedure.
Rule 35 is the rule the permits a party to have a physician of the party’s choice examine the adverse party. Unfortunately, it is often referred to as an independent medical examination, and indeed the opinion mistakenly refers to it as such. Rule 35 exams usually have the same degree of objectivity as a mother opining on the character and physical appearance of her only son.
But on to substance. Very few civil procedure cases find their way to the Tennessee Supreme Court (exception: Rule 56) and when one does get there we need to read it. This is true even in this case where the plaintiff was pursuing a worker’s compensation claim and the issue is primarily covered by the Worker’s Compensation Act.



