Post 18 of this series brings to your attention a change in the law concerning the licensing of lawyers and  pro hac vice admission of lawyers to practice in Tennessee.   The language of T.C.A. Sec. 23-1-108 has been deleted and replaced with the following language:

No person shall practice law in this state without first receiving a license
issued by the Tennessee supreme court and complying with the provisions of
Rule 6 of the Rules of the Tennessee supreme court concerning admission to the
practice of law, except that nothing in this statute precludes the pro hac vice
admission of persons licensed in other jurisdictions in accordance with
Tennessee Supreme Court Rule 19.

Here is a the text of Public Chapter 485.    Here is the text of  Rule 19 of the T.S.C.R.

Post 17 of this series also addresses the subject of court reporting.  This bill establishes: (1) licensure requirements for court reporters; (2) the Tennessee Board of Court Reporting; and (3) the Tennessee board of Court Reporting Fund.   This bill prohibits any person from practicing court reporting  or holding the person out as a court reporter unless the person is a licensed court reporter, except as otherwise provided by law.   

The licensure requirements go into effect July 1, 2010.

Click at the link to see a complete copy of Public Acts,2009 Public Chapter 450.

Post 16 of this series addresses a change in the law applicable to taking of depositions.  The bill summary set forth below describes the original bill as amended.  The new law


prohibit[s] the taking of a deposition before a person who is:

(1) A party to the action or an attorney for one of the parties;
(2) A relative, including a spouse, of one of the parties or of an attorney for one of the parties;
(3) An employee of one of the parties or of an attorney for one of the parties;
(4) Someone who has, or has had during the past two years, a sexual relationship with one of the parties or with an attorney for one of the parties; or
(5) Someone with a financial interest in the action or its outcome.

Post 15 addresses the changes to Tennessee law concerning the proper way to give notice to potential defendants in medical malpractice cases and the changes in the law concerning the certificate of good faith. 

I have addressed this legislation in several other posts  (here is a post with a complete summary) and need not repeat what I have published in the past.  For those of you who are involved in medical negligence litigation I suggest you read my  article on this legislation in the July 2009 edition of the Tennessee Bar Journal.

The predecessor to this law came into effect last October and has resulted in a significant decrease in the number of medical malpractice case filings.  As I wrote in June, the number of filings for the first eight months after the original law law passed are down 60% over a year earlier.  

 

The new members of the Tennessee Judicial Selection Commission have been announced.

Lt. Governor Ron Ramsey appointed the following people:

  1. Miles Burdine, President and CEO of the Kingsport Area Chamber of Commerce
  2. Christopher Campbell, a Memphis attorney
  3. Christopher Clem, a Chattanooga attorney
  4. William Jenkins, Jr., a Dyersburg attorney
  5. Teresa Lee, Senior VP and CLO for Eastman Chemical in Kingsport
  6. Thomas Lawless, a Nashville lawyer
  7. Jack Lowery, a Lebanon lawyer
  8. William Young, GC of BCBS in Chattanooga

Speaker Williams appointed the following people:

  1. David Bautista, an attorney and ETSU professor
  2. Mary Helen Beard, a lawyer with Fed Ex in Memphis
  3. Ana Escobar, a Nashville attorney
  4. Russell Johnson, DA in Loudon County
  5. Ed Martindale, a Jackson attorney
  6. Scott Sims, a Nashville attorney
  7. Denise Stapleton, a Morristown attorney
  8. Barry Ward, a Memphis attorney

The speakers jointly appointed Verna Anne Wyatt of Nashville, the ED of the group You Have the Power, a crime victims advocacy group.

On August 11, 2009 I directed you to an article written by  Steven Robbins on writing better emails.    Here is a great article written by Jim Calloway on managing your in-box.  Jim writes the "Law Practice Tips Blog,"  a great place to learn about law practice management and technology.

An excerpt:

if an e-mail is being retained because it is really a task, save it as a task! Drag it from the inbox to Tasks on the lower left hand corner of display in Outlook 2007. A new Task appears with the subject line and contents of the e-mail. Then do three quick things: edit the subject line to whatever it is you need to do, give it today’s date and determine what the due date should be. It there is a hard due date, add it here. It you need to start on it several days in advance, then give that date as the due date and chance the task(subject) line to ‘do X by Y date.’

The American Association for Justice has issued a report called "Warning!  Safety Violation Ahead."  The report reveals that "a new analysis of government data reveals that more than 28,000 motor carrier companies, representing more than 200,000 trucks, are currently operating in violation of federal safety laws."    The safety violations include "defective brakes, bad tires, loads that dangerously exceeded weight limits and drivers with little or no training or drug and alcohol dependencies."   The accompanying press release indicates that

AAJ obtained data on the safety performance of U.S. trucking companies through the Motor Carrier Management Information System (MCMIS), which is maintained by the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA).  Over a million lines of data were analyzed in an effort to pinpoint just how many unsafe trucks might be on the road.

Tennessee had 107 fatalies involving large trucks in 2007.  The country as a whole had 4808 fatalities and 142,949 non-fatal crashes involving large trucks.  You can access the national database by clicking here.   You can reach the Tennessee database by clicking here.  Trucking companies are listed by city.

An article in Archives of Internal Medicine (2009;169(12):1123-1129) reveals that about 1 in 14 abnormal outpatient test results are either not reported to the patient or the report to the patient is not documented.  The article summarizes a study consisting "of a retrospective medical record review of 5434 randomly selected patients aged 50 to 69 years in 19 community-based and 4 academic medical center primary care practices."

Read an abstract of the article here.

 

Some health care providers are starting to get it.  When you mess up, fix it.  Don’t hide.  Don’t cover it up.  Don’t blame the patient.  Just do the responsible thing and fix it.

Today’s Wall Street Journal  writes about the relatively recent phenomena of hospitals that not only step in and make a fair payment to a person who has been harmed by negligence but go a step further and (a) figure out how and why the error happened and (b) put measures in place to prevent future errors. 

This is absolutely wonderful, and shows that the tort system works.  The purpose of the system is not just to compensate victims of negligence but also to deter future harm.  Other things being equal, wrongdoers who fail to take steps to deter future harm will be hurt in the marketplace.  Thus, the reasonably prudent person who is in the position to cause harm takes steps to prevent harm from occurring.  That means they take advantage of the every error to analyze what they can do to prevent future harm.  And they try to work out something with the victim of that error before litigation, saving everyone transaction costs and potential harm to reputation.

I love to read Dan Hull’s blog, What About Clients?   He gets it.  Or, more precisely, he gets most of it.  He doesn’t get contingent fees, which puzzles me. But the rest of it is firmly within his grasp.

Dan’s post,  Litigation:  Lawyering, Real Life and a Little Zen is one is wish I would have written.  Here is an excerpt from the post, which I hope will wet your appetite to read the rest of it.

The ability "to think like a lawyer"–what you get in law school and then polish in practice–is at most about 8 percent of what you need to be an effective lawyer. That’s right, about 8 percent.*

Contact Information