One repeated argument for restricting the right to trial by jury is that we need to have a state where businesses will want to settle, thereby creating more jobs and strengthening our economy.

Well, to the extent that is a relevant factor in the tort deform effort it is should be off the table in Tennessee.  Why?  The Tennessean  reports that "Site Selection, an Atlanta-based magazine that annually ranks states’ attractiveness to investors, placed Tennessee behind only North Carolina. Tennessee moved up four notches from last year’s rankings."

Read the article here.

There is alot of public outcry about the profits of Exxon Mobil for the 3rd quarter of fiscal year 2008.  The company reported profits of $14.83 Billion for the three months ended September 30, a 58% increase.

Exxon Mobil had revenue of $137.74 Billion during the 3rd quarter of 2008.  So, the company had a profit of 10.76% of total revenue.

So why is Exxon Mobil talking about getting into a new line of business?  

A Handbook for Tennessee Tort Lawyers 2009 is scheduled to arrive in Brentwood on November 3 and will start being shipped to purchasers on November 4.

The 2009 of the book follows the same format as the 2008 version.   It has been expanded to include 8 new chapters and 28  new sections on tort law subjects for a total of  262 sections.  Each section includes the key language of the leading case on that subject and, as appropriate, citations to other important cases on the subject.  Also included is a reference to all opinions released in the last year on tort law organized by chapter and section.

The book also includes the full text of all of the new  statutes of interest to Tennessee tort lawyers.

The Tennessee Supreme Court  released its decision in Hannan v. Alltel Publishing Company and has affirmed Judge Susano’s reversal of summary judgment in favor of the defendant. 

The court, by a 4-1 margin, re-affirmed its decisions in Byrd, McCarley and Blair and held

a moving party who seeks to shift the burden of production to the nonmoving party who bears the burden of proof at trial must either: (1) affirmatively negate an essential element of the nonmoving party’s claim; or (2) show that the nonmoving party cannot prove an essential element of the claim at trial.

I have been doing some reading about Adobe Acrobat recently and came across this post about organizing documents using PDF Portfolios.  I have not tried this method of document organization and, I confess, will probably ask one of our paralegals to look into it for our firm rather than attempting to do so myself.

However, I thought I would share the post to (a) see what experience any of you have had with this method of document organization or (b) give you the opportunity to experiment with it.

This original post is a two-part post.  I will post the second segment when it appears.

The U.S. Department of Heath and Human Services has a website that delivers information on how well hospitals care for patients with certain medical conditions or surgical procedures, and the results of a survey of patients about the quality of care the patients received  during a recent hospital stay.

The site is here.

The Federation of State Medical Boards has a website that allows you to order professional information on physicians and physician assistants.  The reports include infomoration about disciplinary sanctions, education, medical specialty, licensure history and locations.  The cost of each report is $9.95.

Go the this site to place an order.

Limited information on Tennessee doctors (and other licensed health care providers) can be obtained for free at this site.

Why should you care about the decision of the United States Supreme Court in Bell Atlantic Court v. Twombly , 127 S. Ct. 1955 (2007)?

Because it changed the rules of pleading in federal court and, because Tennessee looks to interpretations of the federal rules to interpret its own similar rules, it will be raising its head in Tennessee state court.

What is the change?  Most of us have assumed that a complaint need only contain "a short plain statement of the claim showing that the pleader is entitled to relief and that, at the motion to dismiss stage, "a complaint should not be dismissed for failure to state a claim unless it appears beyond doubt that the plaintiff can prove no set of facts in support of his claim which would entitle him to relief.”  Conley v. Gibson, 355 U. S. 41 at 45–46 (1957); Smith v. Lincoln Brass Works, 712 S.W.2d 470, 471 (Tenn. 1986). 

The Congress has approved changes to the Federal Rules of Evidence, including the addition of Rule 502 dealing with  the waiver of attorney-client privilege and work product protection as a result of inadvertent or intentional disclosure to another party.

Click here for  the text of the rule as it appears in the Congressional Record (9/8/2008).

Thanks to Discovery Resources and Dennis Kiker of Fois Consulting for alerting me about the adoption of this rule.

The Administrative Office of the Courts has released the form that must be filed by plaintiffs in medical negligence cases (and by defendants who allege fault of another health care provider).  Both forms are available here.

In general, a plaintiff must file the certificate within 90 days after filing suit.

My partner Rebecca Blair had an article about the new statute published as the cover story of the Tennessee Bar Journal.   The article can be viewed here.

Contact Information