Here are links to two interesting blog posts by Stewart Weltman in his "Lean and Mean Litigation Blog" on the subject of formulating a discovery plan before taking depositions.  The knee-jerk response is depose everyone, but as this author makes crystal clear that is not always the smart thing to do.

A sample:  "Rule No. 1 in developing a deposition program – you must have a clear conceptualization of what  you want your case in chief to look like at trial and you also must anticipate what you believe the other side’s case is going to look like.   If you don’t, then you are on a rudderless ship that will flounder aimlessly through discovery.  How can you possibly know what to ask if you don’t have a clue (1) what you want your case to look like at trial and (2) what you believe the other side’s case is going to look like?"

Thanks Stewart.

The Insurance Institute for HIghway Safety has announced its TOP SAFETY PICKS for 2009.

The picks " recognize[ ] vehicles that do the best job of protecting people in front, side, and rear crashes based on good ratings in Institute tests. Winners also have to have electronic stability control (ESC), which research shows significantly reduces crash risk."

IIHS reminds us that "[f]ront and side impacts are the most common kinds of fatal crashes, killing about three-quarters of the 28,896 passenger vehicle occupants who died in 2007. Rear-end crashes usually aren’t fatal, but they result in a large proportion of crash injuries. Neck sprain or strain is the most commonly reported injury in two thirds of insurance claims for injuries in all kinds of crashes."

A couple weeks ago I wrote a post about use of PDF Portfolios to organize documents.  The source for that post has recently given us access to an eseminar that he did on creating electronic closing binders using PDF technology – either PDF Binder or PDF Portfolio.  The differences between the two programs are explained in great detail.

The author  has also given us access to a 36-page guide called Creating Electronic Closing Binders using Acrobat 9.

These programs  can be used to create electronic briefs, demand letters, etc.

It has been revealed that Dr. Frederick K. Goodwin, host of NPR’s "Infinite Mind," earned at least $1.3M from drug makers.   He received the payments for giving lectures.   NPR says it did not know about the payments, Goodwin says it did, but clearly the show’s listeners did not.

Did the payments compromise the integrity of the show?  Who knows.  Did they compromise the perception of the integrity of the show?  Yes, beyond a shadow of a doubt.

Everyone understands that people who speak at seminars should be compensated for their time and expertise.  Seminar presentations require lots of work, and even if you have given the exact talk before you are still taking time away from your family, your work, or both.

The Florida Supeme Court has relied on the Restatement (Second) of Torts to impose a duty on the manufacturer of anthrax "to avoid a an unauthorized intercepton and dissemination of the materials."

The lawsuit arose out of the mailing of stolen anthrax some seven years ago that resulted in the death of a man in Florida when he came into contact with the substance at his place of work.

The case is United States v. Stevens, No. SC07-1074  (Fl. Oct. 30, 2008).  Read it here.

Rule 37 of the TRCP makes exclusion of evidence the default sanction for failure to supplement.  The trial judge can impose a lesser or greater sanction.

In a recent  case in Arkansas the Court of Appeals reversed a jury verdict in favor of the plaintiff when the plaintiff failed to supplement answers to interrogatories concerning his medical treatment with a particular doctor.

In Moorehead v. Battles,  the court said this:

Brandon Bass and I are pleased to announce that the inaugural edition of Tennessee Trial Law Report – Tort Law Edition has been printed and mailed to  Tennessee lawyers who we know  practice tort law. 

Brandon and I resigned from our position as editors of the Tennessee Tort Law Letter  and launched this new publication in an effort to better serve the needs of lawyers in the state that do tort work.  It is our view that tort lawyers need to stay current on the law of torts – but we also need to stay current on the law of evidence, civil procedure and trial.  So, Tennessee Trial Law Report summarizes opinions in all four fields, whether those opinions are primarily tort opinions or instead are domestic, commercial or criminal law opinions that have morsels of information tort lawyers need to know.

For example, one of our lead opinions this month is not a tort case at all but rather a Court of Criminal Appeals opinion by Presiding Judge Joe Tipton on expert testimony.  Another of our summaries addresses a non-tort Tennessee Supreme Court case on a important evidence issue. 

The Fall travel schedule begins again. 

Many of you know that  five years ago former Tennessee Supreme Court Justice Penny White, former Tennessee Court of Criminal Appeals Judge Joe Riley and I establsihed a seminar company called "Justice Programs."  We offer a 15 hour CLE program each Fall that permits attendees to meet all mandatory CLE obligations for the entire year and, more importantly, gives civil trial practioners the opportunity to gain valuable information for their practice.   Tomorrow we make our first stop in the year in Chattanooga.

Here is the outline for our course in 2008:

Contact Information