Where an 87-year-old driver ran into a street sweeper, the Court of Appeals affirmed the finding that the street sweeper driver was 51 percent at fault. In Hurst v. City of Morristown, No. E2024-00779-COA-R3-CV (Tenn. Ct. App. July 8, 2025), the plaintiff brought this suit under the Governmental Tort Liability…
Day on Torts
Dismissal of claim against state affirmed based on failure to file appeal within 90 days.
After receiving a denial of claim for his claim against the State from the Division of Claims and Risk Management, the plaintiff had ninety days to file his notice of appeal, not mail his notice of appeal. In Ferguson v. State of Tennessee, No. W2024-00831-COA-R3-CV (Tenn. Ct. App. July…
Mailman’s notation on certified mail was not sufficient for service of process.
A mailman’s notation on a certified letter sent by the Secretary of State did not constitute proper service of process in a car accident case. In Lowe v. Harvey, No. E2024-01588-COA-R3-CV (Tenn. Ct. App. June 27, 2025), the plaintiff and defendant were in a car accident, and the defendant lived…
Tennessee Products Liability Act did not apply to foreign plaintiffs’ claim.
The Tennessee Products Liability Act (“TPLA”) does not apply extraterritorially, and therefore dismissal of a case where the plaintiffs’ injuries occurred in the Dominican Republic was affirmed. In Renel v. Drexel Chemical Company, No. W2023-01693-COA-R3-CV (Tenn. Ct. App. June 6, 2025), the plaintiffs worked in the sugar cane industry. The…
Golf considered recreational activity under TRUS.
The defendant city was immune from suit under the Tennessee Recreational Use Statute for the plaintiff’s personal injuries incurred while he was playing golf on a city golf course. In Bates v. City of Chattanooga, No. E2024-00857-COA-R3-CV (Tenn. Ct. App. June 4, 2025), the plaintiff fell down steps while playing…
Sanctions against the plaintiffs affirmed in TPPA dismissal.
Where the trial court granted a TPPA motion to dismiss on two grounds, but the plaintiffs addressed only one of the grounds in their appeal, dismissal was affirmed. In Black v. Baldwin, No. M2024-00151-COA-R3-CV (Tenn. Ct. App. June 3, 2025), the defendant’s daughter moved in with the plaintiffs, causing issues…
HCLA expert failed to satisfy locality rule.
An expert witness in an HCLA case who admittedly did not know any information about the hospital that administered treatment, including what services it offered or its size, and had never spoken to anyone who worked there or been there in person, did not satisfy the locality rule. In Bowen…
No nuisance liability where plaintiff cannot prove a nuisance existed.
Summary judgment for a nuisance claim was affirmed where the plaintiffs failed to provide any evidence beyond their own affirmations that a nuisance existed. In Heatley v. Estate of Gaither, No. M2024-01097-COA-R3-CV (Tenn. Ct. App. May 29, 2025), the plaintiffs and the defendants lived on two plots of land that…
Causation ruling on auto accident injury reversed.
Where a trial court’s ruling that a plaintiff’s rotator cuff injury was not caused by a car accident was not supported by the evidence, the ruling was reversed. In Payne v. Shelby County, Tennessee, No. W2024-00641-COA-R3-CV (Tenn. Ct. App. May 23, 2025), the plaintiff was riding in the front of…
Dismissal of HCLA case based on unsigned HIPAA authorizations filed with complaint overturned.
Where an HCLA plaintiff filed unsigned HIPAA authorizations with her complaint, but at least one defendant admitted that the HIPAA authorization it received was actually signed, dismissal was reversed. In Buckner v. Complete Wellness Chiropractic Center, No. E2024-00698-COA-R3-CV (Tenn. Ct. App. May 15, 2025), the plaintiff suffered long-term complications after…