Articles Posted in Miscellaneous

The book website is up and running —  www.dayontortsbook.com.

Several people received advance copies of the "selected cases" portion of the book and were kind enough to write down their impressions for me to use in a brochure that you will receive any day now.  Those comments are as follows:

"John Day’s new book is the most in-depth, comprehensive and thorough analysis of Tennessee tort law compiled in years. Every practicing lawyer should have one!"
                                                                                                         Sidney Gilreath, Knoxville

This is an update on my new book, Day on Torts: A Handbook for Tennessee Tort Lawyers.

The book has been printed and is being shipped today from Florida.  I will have it Friday afternoon.  I already have orders for the book and will start shipping on Monday.

The new website, wwwdayontortsbook.com, will up and running on Thursday, November 1, 2007.  The book can be ordered on this web site.  You can also see a Table of Contents and sample chapter at the site.

A judge responds in verse to a claim from a prisoner that he was not provided with a proper diet. The prisoner included a hard-boiled egg as an exhibit.

Thanks to Trial Ad Notes for informing me of the Order.

Pacman Jones, a true embarrassment to Nashville, the Titans, the NFL, and his family, has been sued for his alleged misconduct in Las Vegas which is said to have resulted in the paralysis of a man.  I do not pretend to know the facts, do not want to take one second of my life to learn what they are,  and therefore will not offer an opinion as to the merits of that case.

The lawyer for the plaintiff has also sued the Titans and the NFL for the incident.   According to the Tennessean, "'[t]he fact that the NFL and the Titans did not punish Adam ‘Pacman’ Jones until after Tommy was paralyzed is a proximate cause of Tommy’s injuries,’ attorney Matthew Dushoff said before a news conference in suburban Las Vegas."

The incident did not arise at a football field.  Or a team party.  Or a locker room.  It happened at a strip joint.  In the off season.

I know you remember the Feres doctrine.  The Feres doctrine comes from the decision in Feres v. United States, 71 S.Ct. 153 (1950) and provides that soldiers cannot sue the government for injuries that they incur as part of their military service.  Not surprisingly, the doctrine has been asserted by  government contractors who do work for the military and who seek immunity for their actions.

In McMahon v. Presidential Airways, Inc., No. 06-15303  (llth Cir. Oct 5, 2007) the widows of three soldiers who died in airplane crash in Afghanistan sued the entities that owned an operated the plane.  Feres   was rasied as a defense, but it was not the sole defense.  Here is the table of contents for the 72-page opinion:

I. Derivative Feres immunity

Penny White, Joe Riley and I are on the road again with our 4th annual 15-hour seminar program. 

Here is our schedule for each seminar:

First Day

To what extent are we our brother’s keeper?   That is a constant question posed in cutting edge tort cases, and this case in Illinois is no exception.

Iseberg sued his two partners because they failed to warn him that a fourth partner, Slavin, had made threats against Iseberg’s life.  Iseberg was a man of his word:  he shot Iseberg and rendered him a paraplegic.

From the opinion of the Illinois Supreme Court:

Day on Torts:  A Handbook for Tennessee Tort Lawyers 2008 is at the printer.  The printing date is October 18 and the books should be delivered to Brentwood on October 23, 2007.

You may recall that the book will be updated during the year via a website called "dayontortsbook.com."  I have seen the mock-up of that site – the folks at Justia did a great job on it.  (Justia also developed our firm’s website – www.dayblair.com.  These folks are extremely competent and I really enjoy working with them.) It will be available for public viewing by the end of the month.

Part I of the book is called "Leading Tennessee Tort Cases by Subject."  It contains detailed summaries of 233 cases on 233 tort law subjects.  It also contains citations to well over 1000 additional cases.  Here is the table of contents to this section of the book.

Yesterday afternoon I attended the funeral of Judge Bill Cain of Columbia.

Judge Cain served on the Court of Appeals and had served as a trial judge.  He was a lawyer who loved the law and loved to discuss the subject.  He prided himself on his ability to dive into the books and find the answer to a problem, and was justified in his pride.  We debated many tort law subjects over the years and I found him to be a worthy adversary, someone who not only knew the law but understood why the law was the way it was.  

Judge Cain despised the phrase "reasonable degree of medical certainty" and did his best to relegate it to the ash-heap of history.  He thought the "locality" rule in medical malpractice cases was assine, but applied it because he was duty-bound to do so.  He applied to plaintiffs and defendants, and in fact reversed a jury verdict for the defendant in a Clarksville case because the defendant’s experts did not know the local standard of care.

I have told you in the past that I love Blog 702.  It is a blog of substance, written by someone who knows what they are talking about and who is willing to share what they know.

The authors of Blog 702 have started a series about the concept of "reasonable degree of medical certainty."  Here are the first few paragraphs"

Quite some time ago now, we promised to respond to a Beck & Herrmann post decrying an ALI proposal to abolish any requirement that experts offer their opinions to a “reasonable degree” of medical, professional, or scientific “certainty.” (Call this the “RDC” rule for short.) The ALI proposal would abrogate any RDC requirement and demand only that the expert hold his or her opinion to be more likely true than not — at least in the context of opinions offered to prove causation in tort cases involving physical harm.